I admire Charles Krauthammer as a responsible conservative intellectual, but even he concerns me lately because of some of the absolutely untrue things he will say about Social Security. I refer to physical, provable facts which even I can establish as such in less than half an hour.
This is all confused by the fact that sometimes a statement will be partly true, or arguably true, but the reasoning is wrong. The best example which comes to mind has to do with Vladimir Putin, the current president of Russia (or maybe premier --- they keep changing titles around). You will hear people say "that no-good so-and-so, he's a dictator, a tyrant, and someone should remove him". Then to support the position that Putin is a tyrant they will disgorge a torrent of absolute balderdash to support that conclusion. Or worse, they will just say "I just know it is true". They usually don't have a clue what they are talking about. Where did they get their wonderful analysis? Simply from the mainstream media, TV gurus and daytime talk radio among other sources. They will repeat what they hear word for word. And they act as if they deserve to be taken seriously. If people do not start asking "Is this true"? the country will drown in ignorant and incompetent voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment